Anonymous (not verified) | Mon, 2009-07-06 10:41

"But start making significant cuts to public investment and you'd soon notice the difference. It would be the smaller, most innovative organisations and individual artists who'd suffer the most." - Arts Council staff member

Why? Why does Arts Council England choose to operate in this way when resources dwindle? Why not instead "develop and improve the knowledge, understanding and practice of the arts", as required by the Royal Charter?

The Royal Charter offers a robust recipe for sustained funding of the arts. It is the Arts Council's reluctance to comply with its own Royal Charter that opens the door to serious cuts in public funding.

Reply

Please solve the math problem above and type in the result. e.g. for 1+1, type 2
The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
More information about formatting options